Wednesday, September 12, 2007

WAAYY Overdue Movie Review: Ratatouille

Ratatouille




In Brief: What's Good

  • Excellent graphics & animation, as usual with all Pixar films.

  • Cute and well-designed (although a little flawed and occasionally creepy) story.


In Brief: What's Not So Good

  • A bit formulaic and predictable at times.

  • Even though it's a cartoon, it's still a little hard to accept a rat who knows how to cook and who gets his chance by hiding under a human's hat and controlling his actions.

  • Some of the French accents are pretty thick at times. If it's hard for me to understand occasionally, I would think little kids would have even more trouble.

  • I couldn't help but wonder if some of the food names and cooking terminology would be hard for kids to understand too.

  • Some of the backstory of Linguini's character also seem to be a little mature for kids.


Summary:
C+ Story
B- Acting
B- Directing
A Visuals

Patton Oswalt voices Remy, a rat from the French countryside who is not your typical rat. Remy knows how to read, enjoys watching cooking shows on TV, and has a nose for foods of higher quality than most rats are used to eating. Remy is more ambitious than his father Django (Brian Dennehy), brother Emile (Peter Sohn), and other rats of his clan. He longs to move to the city and to become a chef like a human.


One day, through odd circumstances, Remy is separated from his family and given the chance to pursue his dream at a once famous Parisian restaurant, Gusteau's, named after it's former owner and head chef who has now passed away. There, he meets Linguini (Lou Romano), an accident-prone dish washer who becomes the key to Remy becoming a chef in a real restaurant without being run out for being a rat.


Rounding out the cast are Ian Holm as Skinner, the former sous-chef at Gusteau's who has taken over the restaurant and has greedy plans for Gusteau's recipes; Brad Garrett as the ghost of Gusteau; Janeane Garofalo as Gusteau's only female cook named Colette; Peter O'Toole as Anton Ego, the creepy restaurant critic who may determine the fate of Gusteau's in his next review; and the Pixar veteran John Ratzenberger in the supporting role of Mustafa, the waiter/host at Gusteau's.


Ratatouille is a cute movie that works well enough if you don't take it too seriously. You have to buy into the idea that in the animated world, one rat out of billions can somehow be special enough to read, cook, walk on its hind legs, and communicate non-verbally with a human. If you can do that, you're halfway to enjoying the movie.

But, I have to admit, it still remained creepy throughout the entire movie that a rat, no matter how unusually talented, would cook meals in a public restaurant. Most animated movies about "cute" animals usually advocate the life, rights, emotions, and natural behaviors of those animals. But, in this movie, anytime we're reminded that humans are freaked out by rats, don't like rats in kitchens, and even employ the use of traps and poisons to kill rats, I still felt compelled to side with the humans, rather than the rats--even Remy, the one who seems un-naturally humanlike. Rats carry germs and diseases no matter how smart they are. No amount of animation can make you un-realize that fact.


When it comes to "buying into" the concept, you have to go one step further still when Remy learns how to control a human's hands, arms, and legs, by pulling on the human's hair. For one thing, pulling on a person's hair does not control them like a puppet, and even if it did, that person's scalp would hurt like crazy after a day's work in a busy kitchen. It's just one more unrealistic concept, and therefore, one more reason to continually remind yourself, "It's just a cartoon. Get over it. It's just a cartoon."

In the Pixar movie Cars, it takes a few minutes to buy into the concept of a world in which humans don't exist and different forms of vehicles are the people. That's one big, overall concept. Once you accept that concept, the rest of the movie makes sense. Ratatouille, however, seems forced to explain itself as it goes and continually make excuses for why it should be okay for a rat to be in a kitchen.

While kids, who are used to watching cartoons about animals that act like people, will probably be bothered much less by rats, I would think the thick French accents, the food names and cooking terminology, and some aspects of Linguini's family history, would be a bit confusing to kids. In fact, a friend told me that his two kids did get bored at the movie. I wonder just who this movie was made for. Adults will better understand the accents and cooking content, but kids could more easily overlook the "rat problem" and just enjoy the colorful animation.


I'm probably making the movie sound worse than it is because I'm nitpicking the few small things that are wrong with it. Overall, it is still cute, funny, well-voiced, flawlessly animated, and *almost* heartfelt at times. While I would rank this at the bottom or next to bottom among Pixar's eight feature-length films, it's not like Pixar has ever made a bad film. Pixar may be the best film studio out there because they simply refuse to make a bad film. Ratatouille is another respectable Pixar installment, just not as good as their other films, especially Finding Nemo and A Bug's Life.



Fun Facts from Internet Movie Database


To find out how to animate the scene where the chef is wet, they dressed someone in a chef suit and put him in a swimming pool. That way, they could see what parts of the suit stuck to his body and which parts you could see through.

Fun Facts from Wikipedia


An aquarium of pet rats sat in a hallway for more than a year so that animators could study the movements and behaviors of rats. John Ratzenberger notes he often segued into an Italian accent.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

WAAYY Overdue Movie Review: Live Free or Die Hard

Live Free or Die Hard (Die Hard 4)




In Brief: What's Good

  • Nineteen years after the original movie (yes, 19), Bruce Willis is *still* great in the role of Detective John McClane.

  • Great action scenes.

  • Nice performance by Maggie Q as a techie/kung-fu henchman (uh, henchwoman, henchperson, Senior Hench Technician???).

  • Nice performance by Justin Long (Mac from the "I'm a Mac; I'm a PC" commercials) as a hacker turned hero sidekick.

  • Nice to see other cops and feds just accept John McClane into their operation. After three movies, McClane should not have to prove himself to anyone.


In Brief: What's Not So Good

  • As cool as some action scenes are, some are blatantly unrealistic.

  • A little too much attitude, profanity, and snarkiness from Justin Long's character in the first few minutes of the film (this problem gradually goes away as the movie progresses).


Summary:
B+ Story
B Acting
A- Directing
A- Visuals

Just when you thought Die Hard was a completed trilogy, Bruce Willis returns as NYPD Detective John McClane in a fourth installment that's the best one since the original. This time, electronic terrorism expert Thomas Gabriel (Timothy Olyphant) and his team of cohorts are breaching government computer systems, causing havoc across America and covering their tracks by assassinating hackers who helped them or may be suspected of helping them.


McClane is assigned to investigate a hacker named Matthew Farrell (Justin Long) and ends up protecting Farrell from an explosive assassination attempt and transporting him to the FBI in Washington, DC. McClane must continue to protect Farrell, track down Gabriel, and stop the U.S. power grid from falling victim to Gabriel's radical demonstration of America's lack of electronic security.

With the previous movies clearly establishing McClane's marital problems, this movie doesn't bother with an appearance by Holly McClane/Gennero. Instead, McClane's grown-up daughter Lucy is the center of John's family complications. It's rather predictable that Lucy would get mixed up in the drama, but at least the writers confirm that Lucy has some of her father's genes. She's one tough girl, definitely not a damsel in distress.


Nineteen years after the original, which centered around an elaborate vault theft in a corporate high-rise, the fourth installment gets a modern boost with a plot centered around technology and terrorism. Timothy Olyphant's character Gabriel may not be the most intimidating villain, but he's also one of the most cunning of the series, and his plans of electronic terrorism pose the most widespread threat.


Maggie Q provides much of the excitement as Gabriel's sidekick Mai Linh, who is highly skilled at both electronic security and martial arts. She serves as a thoroughly intimidating villain. I believe Richard Roeper or his guest reviewer on Ebert & Roeper even said that Maggie Q may have been better as the main villain rather than a sidekick to Olyphant.


Bruce Willis and Justin Long have good chemistry together. While John McClane is hardened and experienced at the crime-fighting stuff, his character has to learn to take on the role of bodyguard whenever it's time to let Farrell use his hacker skills. Eventually, the two of them make a good team, complementing each others talents well. The movie takes the obvious jabs at McClane for being old and at Farrell for being a computer geek, but that just makes the team-up that much more fun.


In a summer full of "threequels" (Spider-Man 3, Pirates 3, Shrek the Third, Ocean's 13, Bourne Ultimatum, Rush Hour 3, etc.), it's both surprising and reassuring to see a "fourthquel" do well and be almost as impressive as its original. Despite some stunts, gunshots, crashes, and explosions that are a bit over-the-top, Live Free or Die Hard is a fun, smart, and witty summer action flick and a respectable new installment of the Die Hard franchise.



Fun Facts from Internet Movie Database


This movie addresses an apparent continuity error in the franchise. McClane is afraid of flying in the first two films but not in the third. In the fourth, he explains that he took flying lessons to get over his fears.

Fun Facts from Wikipedia


Jessica Simpson and Britney Spears had previously auditioned unsuccessfully for the role of McClane's daughter Lucy, and at one time Paris Hilton was considered. {What were they thinking???}

Monday, September 10, 2007

WAAYY Overdue Movie Review: Transformers

Transformers




In Brief: What's Good

  • Awesome performance by Shia LaBeouf as Sam Witwicky. (I challenge anyone to say his last name in your head without it coming out, "Lehbooooff".) He made parts of the movie watchable & redeemable (some of which would not have been too watchable otherwise).

  • Occasionally great dialogue & one-liners, mostly spoken by Sam.

  • Great to hear Optimus Prime's voice (Peter Cullen), especially in the ending monologue (which was noble & profound enough to feel out of place with the rest of the movie).

  • Surprisingly good voicing & characterization of Ratchet.

  • Respectable & underused performance by Josh Duhamel as Captain Lennox.

  • Megan Fox's assets. She's healthy. No seriously, her character also has a respectable moment of heroism in the 3rd act that makes her more than just a hot damsel in distress.

  • Loved the *vehicle* forms of all five Autobots.


In Brief: What's Annoying or Frustrating

  • Excessive amount of--and bad utilization of--shaky-cam.

  • In general, badly edited. I often felt like I was watching the middle of fight scenes but rarely seeing the beginning or end of them.

  • The look & spastic nature of Frenzy.

  • The voice & personality of Jazz.

  • Absolutely zero character development for Bonecrusher or Brawl/Devastator (the toys & publicity have him named Brawl, but in the movie, he's still called by his early-development name, Devastator). Those two literally come out of nowhere when needed for battle.

  • The unbelievably campy, and yet unfunny, characters of Agent Simmons (John Turturro) and hacker Glenn Whitman (Anthony Anderson). Those two actors (usually excellent elsewhere) did what they could with the roles, but their characters were written & directed badly.

  • I felt that Megatron's backstory should have been told as a prologue rather than a flashback.

  • The Transformers' method of space travel--and landing--seems riddled with logic flaws (no interstellar travel explained, no controlled landing velocity, lucky they didn't hit civilians upon impact, etc.).

  • The Transformers' method of taking the shapes of Earth vehicles seems *way* too quick and easy. What's from keeping any one of them from deciding to be something else in an instant. If the Autobots needed to be jets and there were jets around, they could be jets; all of a sudden, Prime and Ironhide are Aerialbots. Whaa???

  • Some aspects of the "Allspark" didn't make sense, and the parts that did make sense, I didn't like.

  • The movie makers intentionally stayed away from mass shifting for the Transformers (robots changing their size for vehicle modes). And yet, there's one element of the movie that blatantly exhibits mass shifting capability. Make up your minds.


In Brief: What's Downright Tragic or Disheartening

  • Michael Bay's directing.

  • The story. Just in general, the story.

  • With the exception of Bumblebee, the Autobots don't even seem that heroic, noble, or protective in the beginning.

  • Thanks to massive amounts of shaky-cam and Transformers having thousands of moving parts, it's hard to get a good look at them in robot mode. If I saw a red & blue blur go by, I knew it was Optimus Prime. If I saw a yellow blur go by, I knew it was Bumblebee. If I saw a grey blur go by, I knew it was either Jazz, Starscream, Megatron, or Frenzy.

  • Horrible robot mode designs for Megatron, Starscream, and Frenzy. None of the other Decepticons looked great either.

  • The fates of several Transformers are badly filmed. They're shown either too far away, too blurry, or too quick for there to be any emotional impact.



Summary:
D+ Story
B- Acting
F Directing
B- Visuals

Teenager Sam Witwicky (Shia Lebouf), in an effort to impress a girl named Mikaela (Megan Fox), buys a car. The car turns out to be a transformable alien robot named Bumblebee. Bumblebee's allies and enemies, from the planet Cybertron, are here on Earth in a race to find the much valued Allspark, a mechanical cube of un-matched power and confusing capabilities. Hackers, the military, the government, a secret agency, and even Sam's parents, all add un-needed plot complexity and help rob screen time from big fighting robots.


Michael Bay has taken a colossal crap on my childhood.

I actually walked out of the theater with the urge to smash something. If it weren't for a few redeeming qualities of the movie and a cooling off period during the end credits, I might have turned into the Incredible Hulk right there in the theater. I don't drink, but I felt like I may have needed one.

This movie confirms it. I definitely do not enjoy Michael Bay's style of directing. He seems to care more about blowing stuff up than telling a good story. Don't get me wrong, a movie about large alien robots at war should have stuff blowing up. But, there should also be a way of telling a good story and paying homage to the 1980s cartoon and toyline that "inspired" this movie. If you had to have a license or registration or certification to direct, Michael Bay should have his suspended from him long enough to have someone else direct the inevitable Transformers sequel.


Any time there was an action scene, I just kept thinking, "Please, please, please, let Sam Raimi or Peter Jackson direct Transformers 2." Upon thinking about it further, Christopher Nolan or Bryan Singer would be good too.

On the other hand, I can't blame Michael Bay entirely. The story itself is not great, and that blame goes to the writers, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman. They spent too much time on too many human-driven plotlines and didn't focus enough on the robot characters. And the robots *are* characters, not just gyrating blobs of computer graphics. I feel we could have learned more about the personalities and histories of the robot characters, but most of the Transformers received little or no character development at all. The Transformer with the most screen time, Bumblebee, doesn't even have a voice. Orci and Kurtzman are also writing the screenplay for the 2008 Star Trek "re-boot," and that scares me a little.


The worst thing about it is that I already had reservations about this movie, so I thought my opinion had nowhere to go but up. I suspected I wouldn't totally like Bay's directing style. I had skimmed the graphic novel of the movie at Barnes & Noble, so I knew I wasn't in love with the plot. I had kept up with all the press releases and internet hype, so I knew I didn't like some of the robot designs. I mean, my expectations were somewhat low, and I still walked out of the movie angry.

I was hoping it would surprise me and *at least* be in the B range of quality. Shia "Lehbooooff," Peter Cullen as the voice of Optimus Prime, the realism of the computer graphics (no matter how fast & blurry), and the hotness of Megan Fox, were the saving graces of the movie, or else I would have graded it even lower.



If you're viewing this review from my FaceBook profile and if you can't see the table below, go here for the Blogspot version.

SideNameVehicle
Mode
Robot
Mode
Perso-
nality
VoiceAve-
rage
Autobots Optimus Prime A B B A A-
Bumblebee B D B n/a C+
Ironhide A C D B B-
Ratchet A C B B B
Jazz A A F F C
Decepticons Megatron F F B B D+
Starscream A F D D D+
Blackout A C B B B
Barricade B D A B B-
Brawl A D n/a n/a C+
Bonecrusher B C n/a n/a C+
Frenzy C F F F D-
Scorponok n/a D n/a n/a D




Fun Facts from Internet Movie Database


According to the screenwriters, there was to be more dialogue between Megatron and Starscream, but most of those lines had to be cut out (leaving them in may have helped). Josh Duhamel's character Captain Lennox first appeared in the comic book, "GI Joe vs. the Transformers." In her role as Mikaela Banes, Megan Fox gained ten pounds during filming (how skinny was she to begin with???). While the screenwriters experimented with additional characters, all versions of the script included Autobots Optimus Prime & Bumblebee and Decepticons Megatron & Starscream.

Fun Facts from Wikipedia


On 30 May 2007, more than a month before the film even came out, DreamWorks greenlit two sequels. Shia Lehbooooff, Megan {"appropriately-named"} Fox, and Peter Cullen are all signed on. Director Michael Bay has not officially signed on {thank goodness}. Writers Orci & Kutzman may be too busy with the Star Trek movie. Producer Tom DeSanto has envisioned a sequel storyline with Dinobots, Constructicons, and Soundwave. If Michael Bay does return to direct {please, no}, he has an idea for a transforming aircraft carrier.

WAAYY Overdue Movie Review: Fantastic Four: Rise of the Sliver Surfer

Woops. I got WAAYY behind on blogging, in general, and movie reviewing, specifically. Sorry about that. They might all seem irrelevant by now, but I'm still going to try to review the rest of the movies I've seen this summer. Thanks to being on vacation right now, I think I'm finally able to catch up.

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer




In Brief: What's Good

  • The dialogue is well-written in certain spots, with funny one-liners, especially between the Johnny Storm and Thing characters (also the greatest strength of the first movie).

  • Excellent special effects.

  • Good voicing of the Silver Surfer by Laurence Fishburne.


In Brief: What's Not So Good

  • Low on action.

  • The resolution to the climactic battle sequence seemed as vauge as it was predictable.

  • The character of Dr. Doom continues to seem mis-cast and mis-used.

  • Lackluster performances by Ioan Gruffudd and Jessica Alba as Mr. Fantastic and The Invisible Woman.

  • Jessica Alba, in order to play a blond Sue Storm, either had her hair drastically bleached or is wearing a wig. Either way, her hair looks so fake and/or unhealthy that it's actually distracting to look at her hair during close-ups.

  • The F4's new vehicle, the Fantasticar, looks silly and impractical.


Summary:
C- Story
C+ Acting
C+ Directing
B+ Visuals

Interrupted from the wedding of Reed Richards and Sue Storm, the Fantastic Four must confront an extreme threat to the Earth. The Silver Surfer, an enigmatic being from outer space is preparing the Earth to be devoured by a colossal being named Galactus. Overwhelmed by the power of the Silver Surfer and the prepatory destruction he brings to the Earth, the F4 must work together with an unlikely ally to save mankind from extinction.

The Fantastic Four sequel is just barely better than the original, if I remember correctly. And, it's hard to remember the first one because it was so forgettable.

A lot of the negative hype on the internet was regarding the form of Galactus. In the comics, he's a giant alien with a spiky, purple helmet. In the movie, he's a giant space cloud. I've never read the F4 comics, so that didn't bother me that bad. Neither did it bother me that bad that the Silver Surfer can "phase" through solid objects in the movie, something I'm not so sure he can do in the comics.


Despite not reading the comics, the thing that bothered me more was the continued mis-use of the Dr. Doom character. I've been told that in the comics he's a megalomaniac obsessed with vanity and running his own country. I think I've also been told that he uses magic to achieve his goals. However, when bombarded with cosmic rays in the first movie, Dr. Doom gained the power to control electricity. The sequel continues this huge departure from the comics, and it still seems out of place for the character.

I felt Dr. Doom should be more of a Lex Luthor type character, someone who uses financial and/or political power to fight the good guys rather than raw force. However, with the Sliver Surfer being mysterious and silent for much of the movie and Galactus being a giant cloud, Dr. Doom was--pardon the pun--a necessary evil, as he's a more accessible and relatable villain. But, using him for that purpose made his character feel "tacked on" to a movie with an already troubled plot.

In a way, it's odd that this movie even got made. It's a barely improved sequel to the already lackluster original. It seems to serve more as a "backdoor pilot" (a term usually reserved for TV shows), for a Silver Surfer movie, but I'm not sure that character could support a theatrical release on his own either (although he will likely get a chance; see Fun Facts below). One good thing about it is that it serves as a moderately successful experiment in combining multiple superheroes into a single movie. If other Marvel characters, such as Captain America, Thor, or Ant-Man can't support movies of their own, it might be good to have an Avengers movie including five or six Marvel superheroes at one time.


I don't want to give the impression that F4: Rise of the Silver Surfer is bad. It's just not particulary good either. It's well made for what it is, but when it's over you just get an "eh, so what" feeling. It's an occasionally fun, occasionally humorous, rarely exciting summer movie that is harmless and may be geared more toward younger kids, ones still interested in superheroes but whose parents may be wary of letting their kids watch darker, more brooding superheroes like Batman. If Batman is steak, potatoes, salad, and wine, Fantastic Four is popcorn, candy, birthday cake, and Kool-Aid.



Fun Facts from Internet Movie Database


Don Payne has said that the film is based on Fantastic Four comic issues #48 and 57-60. F4:RotSS was given a PG rating, the first Marvel film to get this rating since Howard the Duck. The cameo where Stan Lee is not allowed in the wedding is in keeping with a scene from the comics in which Stan Lee and artist Jack Kirby are not allowed to the wedding.

Fun Facts from Wikipedia


The main cast, including Julian McMahon who plays Dr. Doom, has signed contracts for three pictures, so there probably be a third (and likely final) F4 movie. J. Michael Straczynski, writer of the 2007 Silver Surfer: Requiem series for Marvel {and creator of Babylon 5, the best TV show--ever}, is writing the screenplay for a Silver Surfer film.

Friday, September 07, 2007

Grammar Quiz

You Scored an A

You got 10/10 questions correct.

It's pretty obvious that you don't make basic grammatical errors.
If anything, you're annoyed when people make simple mistakes on their blogs.
As far as people with bad grammar go, you know they're only human.
And it's humanity and its current condition that truly disturb you sometimes.

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Movie Re-Evaluation: Ocean's 13 Better the 2nd Time

Shoot, I got behind on blogging again. And, I was doing so good at the beginning of June.

Hopefully, I'll be posting reviews for Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (C+ ***), Transformers (C- **), and Live Free or Die Hard (B+ ****) within the next two or three days.

Ocean's Thirteen


I saw Ocean's Thirteen again a couple weeks ago, and it was definitely better the 2nd time around. The plot has just enough complexities that things made more sense in the beginning and middle when I already knew what the end was.

I also watched Ocean's 11 & 12 on DVD between my two viewings of O13 in the theater, so I got my memory refreshed about Eddie Izzard's character of Roman Nagel and about the French thief, both of which were in O12.

So, I now feel better about O13 and feel it deserves an A- rather than B+, which makes it my 2nd favorite movie of the year so far, right behind Waitress.

Old Scores:


 
StoryActingDirectingVisuals

Category Ocean's...
11 12 13
Directing/Pacing
Gadgets/Trickery


New Scores:


 
StoryActingDirectingVisuals

Category Ocean's...
11 12 13
Directing/Pacing
Gadgets/Trickery